Risk requirement for attacking in wilderness

[Banned 42]

These days people create multiple accounts wearing absolutely no risk just to rag you off in the wilderness. To end this problem, there should be risk requirements implemented for attacking.
As example, attacking someone with 50m+ risk should require at least 20m risk for the attacker. This immunity shouldn't be applied to multi, or for the ones holding bloody/bloodier keys.

Atm people just abuse amount of the alts they bring to wilderness to boltrag people off their mains to secure the keys home while risking nothing. Boring content.

[Advanced]

I agree totally, this need to be changed every big server has this?
Hope pali will add this in the next update
Great idea!

[Safiya]

either that or make it so you can toggle it so the person can only attack you if they risk x amount
(obv wouldn't work in multi)

[iamthepapa]

Agreed. Stupid allowing people to sit on 5 acc's ragging you off

[Amorphis]

Support this

[G O A T]

+! this. I understand there's not many pkers in the wild. But its slowly getting very active you legit have kids in full black dhide + ely bolt ragging its so cringe.

[Palidino]

I'll enable the one BW used which was 0-10M, 10-30M, and then 30M+. I can adjust them after the update tonight depending on feedback.

[Zon]

What so you can PM your finland friends to lower food on an alt, and log in with 8 to dd and spec dump..?

[Zon]

+! this. I understand there's not many pkers in the wild. But its slowly getting very active you legit have kids in full black dhide + ely bolt ragging its so cringe.

Stop bolt maging

[Bill Pierce]

what does this mean for me, a level 3? can i enter the wildy?